This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
leo vegoda
leo at ripe.net
Wed Dec 7 09:16:26 CET 2005
Hi Oliver, You wrote: [...] > P.s. @RIPE NCC: Question: Is there a practical way to replace the > slow and cumbersome "consensus" principle of the RIPE by a democratic > majority vote of the RIPE NCC members to stop further damage to IPv6, > perhaps with a decision at the next RIPE NCC general meeting ? > > Of course some RIPE participants might then discuss adresss policies > for ever, but for the RIPE NCC members we would then probably have > practically acceptale policies for implementation in real > world networks. I suppose that changes to the Policy Development Process (PDP) have to go through the PDP. If you want to submit a proposal to that effect then you need to complete a proposal template and pass it to the relevant WG chair. You can find the template at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/template/ There are also links to the main documents on that page. Regards, -- leo vegoda RIPE NCC Registration Services Manager
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]