[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria

On 4-apr-05, at 14:44, Gert Doering wrote:

>> I guess that it may make sense to define a time frame here... i mean,
>> an organization planning to provide IPv6 connectivity in 20 years 
>> would
>> qualify here?

> Yes.  But how much harm can it do?  This organization would eat up 
> about
> 1/4294967296 of the address space, and pay a yearly fee to RIPE to
> be permitted to keep it.  Sounds like a fair deal to me.

So where do I send the bill for the fee to take up space in my routing 
table?

No deal.

> If the address space is allocated and doesn't even end up in the 
> routing
> tables, even better.

That's what's site local ng is for.