This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mike Hughes
mike at linx.net
Mon Apr 4 14:49:23 CEST 2005
--On 04 April 2005 14:13 +0200 marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo at it.uc3m.es> wrote: > I guess that it may make sense to define a time frame here... i mean, an > organization planning to provide IPv6 connectivity in 20 years would > qualify here? I'd suggest we steer clear of yet more seemingly arbitrary numbers and limitations. It should be an immediate "demonstrable need", which would be in harmony with the initial IPv4 allocation policy. Regards, Mike -- Mike Hughes Chief Technical Officer London Internet Exchange mike at linx.net http://www.linx.net/ "Only one thing in life is certain: init is Process #1"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]