This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Apr 5 10:18:12 CEST 2005
Hi, On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:46:32PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > >> gert, i am too busy to find the quote for you right now, but > >> the essence is that EVERY size limit that has EVER been done > >> in computing has proved to be to small in the long run. > > It has also been proven that EVERY memory size problem > > has been solved so far. > > by changing the addressing. and that is exactly where we got > into trouble last time. and our grandchildren will have the > same problem again. So what do *you* propose to do now? (On the math thing: you conveniently ignored my argument that we'll run into other limits *far* earlier than into the depletion of /32s - and unless *those* are solved, address depletion by handing out routable /32s really is a non-issue) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]