[address-policy-wg] Re: [Ticket #1032183] Autoreply: viadomains <bleep>

On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 13:48 -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> i have plonked all mail from vianetworks.co.uk.  if they ever get
> a clue and have something useful to say, someone please tell me.

Ah, thus I was not the only one getting those silly "you are spamming"
replies, then again if you look at their Bayesian filter:

> >  pts rule name              description
> > ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> >  1.0 RCVD_FROM_SECONDARY    Went through secondary MX record
> >  0.1 TW_VT                  BODY: Odd Letter Triples with VT
> >  5.4 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
> >                             [score: 1.0000]
> > -0.4 AWL                    AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment

Indeed... those folks will not get much mail.
I mean if this ML result in 99% spam probability, ouch ;)

Greets,
 Jeroen

(And yes, I already send a message to address-policy-wg-owner at ripe.net
and also one to ops at ripe.net with the content that they might want to
throw that subscriber from the list...)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20050405/b43e2bbc/attachment.sig>