[address-policy-wg] Re: [Ticket #1032183] Autoreply: viadomains <bleep>

i have plonked all mail from vianetworks.co.uk.  if they ever get
a clue and have something useful to say, someone please tell me.

randy

> From: via-domains <domains at vianetworks.co.uk>
> RT-Ticket: Ticket #1032183
> Managed-by: RT 3.2.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
> RT-Originator: randy at psg.com
> To: randy at psg.com
> 
> Thank you for your enquiry concerning "Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria", a summary
> of which appears below. It has been logged with our automated ticketing
> system and will be forwarded on to the appropriate department.
> 
> You have been allocated a unique reference number - [Ticket
> #1032183] - for this query that should be used in all further
> correspondence relating to this matter. If replying by email, please
> make sure that the ticket number is in the subject header.
> 
> Thank you for your query,
> 
> VIA Networks UK Support Administration
> domains at vianetworks.co.uk
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Spam detection software, running on the system "he401war", has
> identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
> similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
> sysadmin at vianetworks.co.uk for details.
> 
> Content preview:  >> and we once thought 32 bits of address should be
>   enough for ever > *I* wasn't part of that "we" - and the math is a
>   *little* bit different > here. > *I* wasn't part of that "we" one of
>   the few benefits of age is perspective [...] 
> 
> Content analysis details:   (6.1 points, 5.0 required)
> 
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
>  1.0 RCVD_FROM_SECONDARY    Went through secondary MX record
>  0.1 TW_VT                  BODY: Odd Letter Triples with VT
>  5.4 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
>                             [score: 1.0000]
> -0.4 AWL                    AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment
> 
> 
>