This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
steffann at nederland.net
Mon Apr 4 16:07:57 CEST 2005
Hi Gert, > We're not making this policy, this *is* policy - same > document, 5.4.1, and I do not see any proposal to change this. > > So please don't intermix "initial allocation criteria" (5.1.1) with > "end user assignment sizes" (5.4.1) - and *please* don't change 5.4.1 > or RFC3177. Ok. I got a little confused by the other messages on the list. Like I said: I don't have any problems with the /48 assignment size, and if there is no proposal to change it: even better :-) - Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]