This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Apr 4 14:42:12 CEST 2005
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:10:15PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
> This I am not so sure about. Fixing the assignment size on /48 makes the
> structure of address allocations and assignments very clear, but I am not
> sure if we should make this official policy or just a recommendation. I
> don't see a problem with assigning a /48 to a customer, but maybe this
> should be the decision of the LIR...
We're not making this policy, this *is* policy - same document, 5.4.1, and
I do not see any proposal to change this.
So please don't intermix "initial allocation criteria" (5.1.1) with
"end user assignment sizes" (5.4.1) - and *please* don't change 5.4.1
or RFC3177.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]