This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
ripe-lst at ripe.net
Mon Jun 21 21:20:09 CEST 2004
On Monday 21 June 2004 20:06, Gert Doering wrote: Hi Gert, > OK. How exactly do you define "good standing"? This needs to be something > that a RIR hostmaster can base a decision on...? In UK/Ireland a "member in good standing" is defined as someone who "have all their fees paid and have no disciplinary action pending" ;) I *think* what ARIN meant was an established LIR > Personally, I like Oliver Bartels' proposal. :-) Yes, I would sign that, too. rgds, Sascha Luck -- DDO Eirconnect
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]