This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hans Petter Holen
hpholen at tiscali.no
Wed Jan 14 17:56:40 CET 2004
Could somebody summarize what the APNIC objections to changed policy are ? -hph |> So if we send out a formal proposal to change RIPE things to RIPE |> lists, and nobody from the RIPE community objects - what's |wrong with |> assuming consensus, then? | |maybe because we have not yet implemented that packets and |routing information stay only within the ripe region? it's |the global internet we're affecting. | |think locally, act globally | -- motto of the small view polluter | |randy |
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]