Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

Gert,

you have not been right when assuming that DENIC is only looking for an 
IPv4
solution. All of our nameservers should have full and native V4 _and_ V6
connectivity which includes the anycast servers as well.

> > Do you mean one (1) /32 that can be cut up into smaller
> > allocations (/48) which then should appear in the global
> > routing table, allowing the services that reside in those
> > blocks to be anycast? Or do you mean multiple /32's as the
> > case is for the moment*?
> 
> For the routing table size, it doesn't really matter.  Neither for the 
> global address usage.
> 
> For filtering reasons, /32s would be more convenient.
> 
> (But we're not talking v6 yet :-) - DENIC aims at a v4 policy change)
> 
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster

Regards
Andreas Baess
-- 
DENIC eG
Wiesenhüttenplatz 26
D-60329 Frankfurt