[address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:01:00PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > I would be happy to sacrifice one routing table entry per 
> > ccTLD, though,
> > if it increases reliability of the whole DNS system.  Speaking for my 
> > network only, of course.
[..]
>
> Do you mean one (1) /32 that can be cut up into smaller
> allocations (/48) which then should appear in the global
> routing table, allowing the services that reside in those
> blocks to be anycast? Or do you mean multiple /32's as the
> case is for the moment*?

For the routing table size, it doesn't really matter.  Neither for the 
global address usage.

For filtering reasons, /32s would be more convenient.

(But we're not talking v6 yet :-) - DENIC aims at a v4 policy change)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  57882  (57753)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299