[address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:18:39AM +0000, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote:
> >That's why I'm in favour to have a policy that permits allocations for
> >specific, well-defined Anycast services.  That allocations would come
> >from a well-known block, so people would know to not filter /24s from
> >there (and so on).
> 
> I agree that there should be a specific and well-defined policy. But I
> think that this policy does not need to be restricted to anycast services.

We don't *want* a "everybody that doesn't like the current policy can 
just get addresses under the execptional policy"-policy.

A specific problem needs solving.

Besides this, the current policy works well.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  57882  (57753)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299