[address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

>That's why I'm in favour to have a policy that permits allocations for
>specific, well-defined Anycast services.  That allocations would come
>from a well-known block, so people would know to not filter /24s from
>there (and so on).

I agree that there should be a specific and well-defined policy. But I
think that this policy does not need to be restricted to anycast services.
It is a good thing to allocate only /24s and not any longer prefixes like
/32 because there is no shortage of IPv4 address space and no need to
conserve this space so severely. And I think that the well-known block 
used
for this type of allocation should come from the old "Class C" swamp
space. We have recovered lots of unused addresses from this area and
we should begin to allocate them for special purposes which can benefit
a large part of the community.

--Michael Dillon