This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jan 7 16:58:51 CET 2004
Hi, On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > what's special about ARIN's or ICANN's network, as opposed to the > > network that runs google.com? > ARIN (or ICANN or AFNIC or DENIC) manage public resources. I don't claim that ARIN or ICANN or DENIC are not special, or are not important for the functioning of the Internet as a whole. But what's special about *their network*? In which way is their *network* different from any order garden variety customer network? Answer: from a technical point of view, it isn't. It's routing IP packets, it has upstream ISPs, and name resolution is done just fine via DNS. (Root name servers *are* special, because they can't be resolved via DNS (obviously)). >From a user point of view, ICANN, ARIN, DENIC, and whoever are even less special. If any of those networks falls off the earth for a day, the average user won't even notice - but if Google is offline, they *will* notice. > > I'd say Google is much more critical to the average network user... > May be but it is a private and for-profit company. It does not manage > a public resource. In which way makes "manage a public resource" a network infrastructure "critical"? Why isn't whitehouse.gov a "critical network infrastructure"? (To repeat myself: I have no doubts that all these instutitions are very important for the well-being of the network. But IP being what it is, their network infrastructure is "just any other network"). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 57882 (57753) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]