This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[ppml] Re: [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] Re: [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeff Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Tue Oct 28 21:51:49 CET 2003
David and all,
David Conrad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>> It's not scarce and the vast majority of IPv4 LIRs will
> >>> be deploying IPv6 sometime. So why don't we just give every single
> >>> one of them an IPv6 /32 today. Instead of creating barriers to the
> >>> adoption
>
> The obvious implication of this is that it pretty much guarantees the
> creation of a new and potentially much bigger swamp.
Hi David! I agree here.
>
>
> I'll leave it to others to determine if that is a serious concern.
>
> Rgds,
> -drc
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
- Previous message (by thread): [ppml] Re: [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]