This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[ppml] Re: [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] Re: [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
david.conrad at nominum.com
Mon Oct 27 16:58:10 CET 2003
Hi, >>> It's not scarce and the vast majority of IPv4 LIRs will >>> be deploying IPv6 sometime. So why don't we just give every single >>> one of them an IPv6 /32 today. Instead of creating barriers to the >>> adoption The obvious implication of this is that it pretty much guarantees the creation of a new and potentially much bigger swamp. I'll leave it to others to determine if that is a serious concern. Rgds, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [ppml] Re: [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]