This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hans Petter Holen
hpholen at tiscali.no
Fri Aug 29 12:51:31 CEST 2003
> BUT... information like the equipment being used or a network > plan or so _must_ be optional information, not _required_ information. > It can't be that a company is _required_ to make statements about > their network and equipment if they want to have IP-Adresses! > (and no, RIPE doesn't always qualify for receiving such information). This indeed an interesting point of view. It has been the practice for as long as I can remember for the RIPE NCC to ask for documnetation for the need for IP addresses. Is there strong support in the community to remove this cirteria ? If not, how should the LIR/RIR verify this criteria ? Best Regards, Hans Petter
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]