This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Tue Aug 19 20:40:48 CEST 2003
(I am late in this discussion due to vacation and a crashed laptop) >>>>> And what about public exchange points? >>>> >>>> In which way are ccTLDs related to public exchange points? Or are >>>> you >>>> referring to the discussed "abandon PI" policy change? >> >> In no way ... that was a separate question related to the PI policy >> change. I should have put a "P.S." in front. Sorry for confusion. ;-) > > Okay :-) - I have no clear answer on the exchange point question. Many > of them are LIR already anyway (so they use PA). This is not true. LIR - yes; PA - no. They do not met the requirements. That is part of the problem. > The approach with a > one-time service fee to get "PI-like" space might work out for them. Yes, that was the idea. - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]