This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oliver Bartels
oliver at bartels.de
Mon Aug 11 12:27:51 CEST 2003
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:36:54 +0200, Gert Doering wrote: >That's an operational problem, not a technical one. > >If IANA/ICANN isn't working, give them a good beating, but please don't >break policy to cover for human deficiencies. Well, the policy is for the humans and not the humans for the policy. We are all *service* providers and thus we should deliver the *service* the customer which the customer demands. If there is a reasonable demand for PI (whether v4 or currently unsolved v6), we should try to do our best to serve this demand. Just my 2 cent for your "I don't like independend address space" position, which I don't believe is the position of the majority of the ISP's. Best Regards Oliver Bartels Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]