TTM as a regular service

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 28 Jul 2000 08:42:13 -0000
From: owner-tt-host at ripe.net
To: tt-ops at ripe.net
Subject: [ripe-ttraffic #22900] BOUNCE tt-host at ripe.net:    Non-member
    submission from [mike.norris at heanet.ie]   

From: mike.norris at heanet.ie
Reply-To: <mike.norris at heanet.ie>
Sender: "Mike Norris" <mike.norris at heanet.ie>
To: "'Henk Uijterwaal \(RIPE-NCC\)'" <henk at ripe.net>, <tt-wg at ripe.net>,
        <tt-host at ripe.net>
Subject: RE: TTM as a regular service
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 09:44:18 +0100


Henk et al
     many thanks for a fine document (as befits a fine service).
Just two comments at the minute:

1.  The way in which membership (section 2.3) is handled is
simple and straightforward.  However, at current levels of LIR-service
fees, it's not equitable; a 'small' LIR taking TTM service gets bumped
up two levels to 'large', but a 'large' LIR gets no benefit at all.
It would be slightly fairer if TTM service moved you up one category,
though still unfair to 'large' LIRs.  Perhaps this needs to be looked
at in the overall context of categories and charges for **all** services.

2.  The service contract needs to be carefully worded especially
when it comes to disclosure of results.  The views of RIPE NCC and
of the service community need to be reflected, and protected, here.

All the best.

Mike Norris


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-tt-wg at ripe.net [mailto:owner-tt-wg at ripe.net]On Behalf Of
> Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC)
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 2:37 PM
> To: tt-wg at ripe.net; tt-host at ripe.net
> Subject: TTM as a regular service
> 
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> I have put a new version of the "TTM as a regular service" 
> document on the
> RIPE-NCC website at:
> 
>    http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/ttm/#docs
> 
> The document number is 209, please select your favorite format.
> 
> This version is currently being turned into a legally correct service
> contract by our lawyers.  So-far, they have indicated that 
> everything in
> the draft, can be legally implemented. Obviously, the 
> contract itself will
> also be published once it is ready.
> 
> New in this version is section (2.4) on the transistion for 
> the current
> test-box hosts from the current to the new model.  Since we 
> (obviously)
> don't want to lose any existing site when going to a regular 
> service, we
> really like to get some feedback from the current hosts.
> 
> Please send any questions or comments that you might have to
> tt-wg at ripe.net.  Note that in order to post to that list, you 
> have to be
> subscribed to it.  Mail to majordomo at ripe.net for 
> instructions on how to
> subscribe.
> 
> For the people asking me about test-boxes: the interface 
> between PC and
> GPS receiver is being manufactured as we speak and all order 
> components
> have been ordered and should be here late August.  We plan to have all
> documents, as well as a glossy for your manager, ready by 
> RIPE37, so we
> can ship out the first boxes soon after that.
> 
> Henk
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> Henk Uijterwaal                    Email: henk.uijterwaal at ripe.net
> RIPE Network Coordination Centre     WWW: 
> http://www.ripe.net/home/henk
> Singel 258                         Phone: +31.20.535-4414,  Fax -4445
> 1016 AB Amsterdam                   Home: +31.20.4195305
> The Netherlands                   Mobile: +31.6.55861746  
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> 
> A man can take a train and never reach his destination.
>                                                (Kerouac, well 
> before RFC2780).
>