New RIPE NCC Website
Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) henk at ripe.net
Tue Jan 11 13:52:54 CET 2000
Dear Colleagues, In case you have not seen this message before: > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ripe-list at ripe.net > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 6:04 PM > To: Local Internet Registries in Europe; Reseaux IP Europeens > Subject: New RIPE NCC Website > > Dear Colleagues, > > The RIPE NCC is happy to announce the launch of its re-structured > Website. > > The aim was to provide users of the site with more structure and ease > of use without eliminating the clarity of the pages which have > received recognition in the past. > > With the new structure in place, we hope that you will find it > easy to navigate through the site and find all of the information > you require. The site also marks the launch of the new RIPE NCC > logo. > > A special thanks to all who have provided input to the new site. > > Naturally, any errors can be reported to <webmaster at ripe.net>. > > Regards, > > Paul Rendek > Communications Officer > > -----Original Message----- Please note that this means that many of the URL's on our site have been changed, including: 1. The Test-Traffic Measurements homepage: http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/ttm/ 2. The Test-Traffic Measurements daily plots page: http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/ttm/Plots (This page is, as before, only accessible to sites hosting a test-box). 3. Routing Information Service (RIS) pages: http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/np/ris-index.html Please replace any bookmarks pointing to these pages that you may have. Kind regards, Henk Uijterwaal ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal at ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre WWW: http://www.ripe.net/home/henk Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.535-4414, Fax -4445 1016 AB Amsterdam Home: +31.20.4195305 The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Committee (...) was unable to reach a consensus that substantial merit was lacking. Thus, the appeal was deemed meritorious. (Orlando NABC #19).
[ tt-host Archive ]