[techsec-wg] TechSec meeting, RIPE 48
bill bmanning at karoshi.com
Thu Mar 25 13:53:43 CET 2004
> > [Quoting bill, on Mar 25, 13:33, in "Re: [techsec-wg] Tec ..."] > > > > So, please, anyone with an agenda points, a contribution > > > or anything else to discuss of present: speak up NOW! > > > > I'd like to have a brief, open-ended discussion > > on DNSSEC validation. I'd be happy to put some > > talking points together, but have no definitive > > answers. Only questions. :) > > Such a discussion seems very worthwhile, and NLnet Labs can > certainly contribute also, but... for what reason do you want > to do this in the TechSec working-group, instead of in the DNS > working-group? Well... Some of this has to do w/ my view that the validator function is independent of the resolver and that the application/validator interaction is not well understood from either the app.developer or the validator spec writer. So its not really a DNS issue, to my mind. :) > > -- yed >