[techsec-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Incident Response Service (IRS) [was: Unneeded RIPE tasks] (fwd)
Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) henk at ripe.net
Thu Aug 28 13:40:00 CEST 2003
Dear Hank, For your first question, please see Daniel's quote from RIPE271 and further text in his posting earlier today. > >with more details about the IS activity. This paper was discussed at > >RIPE45 and people have been invited to comment on this document on the > >tt-wg at ripe.net list. Then the proposed budget: > > The test-Traffic WG, as per its charter states: [...] Speaking as the former chair of the tt-wg: Formally speaking you are right, it is outside the charter of the TT-WG. However, after Daniel's presentation at RIPE45 and subsequent discussion, the question was raised where further comments on the topic could be posted. As the IS activity overlaps between at least 5 different WG's (tt, techsec, services, routing, DNS*) and none of them is exactly the right place for this discussion, we arbitrarily picked the tt-wg list. There haven't been that many postings on the topic as I'd hoped, but comments are still welcome. Henk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal at ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre WWW: http://www.ripe.net/home/henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ That problem that we weren't having yesterday, is it better? (Big ISP NOC)