interesting

Well - I re-wrote this part in net2net.pl and I can easily believe I
screwed this. I'll take a look later today.

		--Tony.

 Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net> writes:
  * 
  *   > Jessica Yu <jyy at merit.edu> writes:
  *   > I think the problem is that the software allows 198.022.064.0/24 
  *   > and treats it as different IP address, 198.22.64.0/24 ~= 198.022.064.0/
  * 24.    > I think the software should either
  *   > not allow such ip address (198.022.064.._) or convert it to 198.22.64/2
  * 4.  
  * 
  * I believe it should convert. I also believe it did at some point.
  * We will look into this.
  * 
  * Daniel



-------- Logged at  Fri May 26 21:05:39 MET DST 1995  ---------