interesting

Hi, 

These two are really same record,i.e. same IP address with the same ASorigin.
They should not be co-exist in the same DB.  I think the problem is that the
software allows 198.022.064.0/24 and treats it as different IP address, 
198.22.64.0/24 ~= 198.022.064.0/24.  I think the software should either
not allow such ip address (198.022.064.._) or convert it to 198.22.64/24.  We
can avoid the problem.  By the way, there are at least 5 route object has
this case.  It make it difficult for us to generate RS configuration which is
how I discover this.  

						--jessica 



cannes.merit.edu(49): whois -h radb.ra.net 198.22.64.0
route:       198.22.64.0/24
descr:       Lodden Technology, Ltd.
descr:       5850 Dixie Hwy
descr:       Clarkston
descr:       MI 48346, USA
origin:      AS4200
comm-list:   COMM_NSFNET
advisory:    AS690
mnt-by:      MAINT-AS4200
changed:     nsfnet-admin at merit.edu 950406
source:      RADB

route:       198.022.064.0/24
descr:       NET-LODDEN-FV3
origin:      AS4200
advisory:    AS690 1:4200(147) 2:4200(218) 3:4200(187) 4:4200(11) 5:4200(173)
mnt-by:      MAINT-AS4200
changed:     phil at agis.net  950403
source:      RADB




-------- Logged at  Fri May 26 11:20:34 MET DST 1995  ---------