Syntax checking
Tony Bates
Thu May 18 19:32:44 CEST 1995
Jessica Yu <jyy at merit.edu> writes: * >Wow - this one had me digging through that crap code I wrote for all * >this syntax nonsense and I needed to look at the logic again as to why * >this is okay. * * Please check. The reason I concern about it is that I am not sure the tool * s * e.g. peval,etc. would take it well. * They have to deal with it as a community. In this case it was not meant this way but there you go. * >ALL is valid syntax as is can infact we a community * >(ugly I know) but true in the definition. * * I have some difficulties to parse this. Would you explain? * OOPS - sorry - was typing too fast as usual. ALL is valid syntax as ALL can infact be a community according to the definition. * --Jessica * --Tony. -------- Logged at Thu May 18 20:05:20 MET DST 1995 ---------
[ rr-impl Archive ]