Andrew: BGP->Route object translator
bmanning at ISI.EDU
Wed May 3 16:20:33 CEST 1995
> > All FYI: > > Andrew has come up with a clever way around the IRR intent: simply > machine-generate his route objects from the live BGP tables and submit > them daily. > > Advantages: everything is registered, just like we want it. > > Disadvantages: even things we'd have hoped a human would filter out > (net 10) get registered. (Also, a certain amount of thrash in the DB). > > Comments? > Well, net10 can and should be registered, just as you state in the advantages column. I dislike the thrash, but I expect it is inevitable. (What happens when we go to 15min RS updates?) Otherwise, I expect that this is only half of what he should be placing in the IRR. Simple dumping of BGP tables does not get you the policy expressions that most people are using to generate filters. Is Andrew going to accept any/every thing in the IRR? --bill -------- Logged at Wed May 3 20:39:57 MET DST 1995 ---------
[ rr-impl Archive ]