Towards a Disjoint IRR

> There is support for secondaries, though I have't tried it, it looks
> simple enough.  I agree that the US RADB should not claim to be
> authoritative over RIPE for European networks, but I see no reason why
> they (or ANS, or MCI) can't mirror RIPE information in a separate
> database that is periodically fetched in its entirety from RIPE.
> 
> I thought I clearly mentioned a distribution of primary authority with
> RADB mirroring some registries and serving as primary for providers
> who don't run their own registry, or prefer to mirror the RADB (and
> leave them with the registration headaches).
> 

Why does this sound like something that I have seen before?  Can you say
DNS?  Sure you can!

-- 
--bill



-------- Logged at  Wed May 3 16:01:48 MET DST 1995  ---------