Towards a Disjoint IRR

> > + If you suspect you have newer data, please tell the user asking where he
> >   wants to be registered. If the user is European suggest registering in
> >   the RIPE RR.
> > 
> >   >    AND WHICH HAS ADVISORY AS690 LINES, remove that net from the RADB?
> > 
> > Usually we are not happy about modifying user data. After requests from
> > our users and some evaluation we are prepared to make an exception for
> > the 'advisory: AS690' attributes, provided we can receive a complete list
> > of them from you at the flag day. We will then add those to the RIPE RR
> > and tell the users.
> 
> Flag day is scheduled for next Monday, May 8.  (Hopefully).

Actually, next Monday, May 8 is when we hope to turn the PRDB off, 
move all its route objects into the RADB, and retire the PRDB.  This
date does not have to have anything to do with other flag days, such
as when ANS accepts the MCI.db or CANET.db into its config generation,
or when it accepts the RIPE.db, or when it switches to Curtis' AS690
object that makes AS690 advisories unnecessary.

Daniel, I think between Curtis and me we've all ready said that your
copying the AS690 advisories into the RIPE db is probably no longer
a timely idea.  Even if that turns out not to be the case, I don't
think it needs to be correlated with the May 8 "Death of the PRDB"
flag day.

--Dale



-------- Logged at  Tue May 2 22:02:45 MET DST 1995  ---------