AS 690 aut-num progress (LONG!!!)
Dale S. Johnson
Fri Mar 17 17:30:49 CET 1995
Curtis, > There is one problem for which there is no way to express the > requirement in ripe-181. There is no way to specify an as-in line > (which is required and has no means restrict to specific peers) and no > way to specify that certain destinations are not accepted at all at > some peers using interas-in or as-in lines. This is need where we > peer with someone at two interconnects, accept one as primary and > don't accept the same set of routes from the other peering at all. There is a hack Cengiz came up with: Create a fake interas-in line for a non-existant interface, and give that line the same policy as the as-in line. (The current AS690 object in the RADB does this using local IP 0.0.0.0/32). That way any code following the spec will say "Ok; everything is accepted through the non-existant interface; I guess the other interfaces accept only what they explicitly list". --Dale -------- Logged at Fri Mar 17 20:10:04 MET 1995 ---------
[ rr-impl Archive ]