AS path extensions
Daniel Karrenberg
Tue Mar 7 09:14:44 CET 1995
> Jessica (Jie Yun) Yu <jyy at merit.edu> writes: > > The reason we propose to use cisco notation for ASpath is that it has large > 'installed base'. Network operators understand it and are using it. I am not saying "do not use it". I am saying "do not refer to vendor documentation". > >Example 4 contradicts your text in the Interaction para. > >The as paths are not anchored either ?!? > > Note, Example 4 is to show an invalid object as stated in the text above it > . I still do not understand why it is invalid. Also: Shouldn't the paths be anhored with ^ and $? > But there is a typo afterwords: 'E.g. 6' should be 'E.g. 5'. Yep. Daniel -------- Logged at Tue Mar 7 18:52:06 MET 1995 ---------
[ rr-impl Archive ]