Routing Policy System Working Group

  > cengiz at ISI.EDU (Cengiz Alaettinoglu) writes:
  > 
  > 
  > Daniel Karrenberg (Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net) on February 28:
  > >   > and RIPE pride tools will be upgraded to support RPSL
  > >   > as an initial set of tools.
  > > out of scope!

I mean that the WG as such is not going to write or modify any code.
So this does not belong in the charter. What do you wnat the WG to
do in this area?

  > Do you mean that the generating tools is out of scope, or upgrading
  > pride tools?

Both.

  > Even if we do not build tools as a part of the wg effort, we should
  > still discuss what tools will be of use to the community and try to
  > come up with definitions for them so that anyone can implement.

That would be within scope of a WG charter. It should certainly be discussed
with the AD.

  > the database model will be based on the RIPE registry;

the regsistry model will be based on the RIPE database.

[sorry to be nit-picking ;-)]


Daniel



-------- Logged at  Wed Mar 1 09:46:48 MET 1995  ---------