Towards a Disjoint IRR
Eric M. Carroll
Fri Apr 28 21:49:09 CEST 1995
Dale, I support your view that a disjoint IRR is the correct vision, since it places the administrative burden closer to those who maintain the routers, and thus are the consumers of their own data. For example, CA*net has alot invested in keeping its own data accurate, since any errors will be expressed directly into our routers. Also, I believe the central "one registry to rule them all" model will not scale. As to the data cleanliness issue for conversion, canet.db has been carefully sanitized. PRDB CA*net data has not been (and will not be) carefully checked. I state authoritatively that canet.db is more accurate than PRDB. I encourage you to purge all CA*net data from the PRDB and use our database file instead. Please note that CA*net has taken the time to construct AS690 advisory lines for your routing enjoyment... Eric Carroll University of Toronto Network & Operations Services External Networking Facilities Management CA*net Network Engineering -------- Logged at Fri Apr 28 23:06:13 MET DST 1995 ---------
[ rr-impl Archive ]