Draft of RIPE81++

> * We were in agreement until a few weeks ago that these would be optional
> * and to make them mandatory simply to resolve a syntax problem when
> * other solutions are available is a loss
> * 
>Well perhaps it may have seen that way but this is probably due to me
>copying in Jessicas text without checking properly.

Tony, it sounded like I just sneaked text in :-) but actually we really agreed
to make the gateway field in interas-in/out optional during our meeting at 
Toronto. (after a couple of bottles of beer ?:-)).  Below is the message 
you sent out summaring the result of the meeting.  Point 1. reflects the
agreement.  Thanks!

						--Jessica

Date:    Wed, 27 Jul 1994 23:37:31 +0200
To:      rr-impl at ripe.net

From:    Tony Bates <Tony.Bates at ripe.net>
Subject: Summary of small meeting with merit of the last ripe-81++ issues

Replied: Wed, 03 Aug 1994 12:38:30 -0400
Replied: jyy at merit.edu
Replied: Tony Bates <Tony.Bates at ripe.net>
Return-Path: tony at ripe.net
X-Phone: +31 20 592 5064
X-Fax:   +31 20 592 5090
Sender:  Tony.Bates at ripe.net

Here follows the actions and issues resulting from a small meeting
today here in Toronto. 

1. The optional parts as per Jessica messages would be made clear in
the interas-in/interas-out syntax.

2. Jessica will submit the changes to the syntax in the pref-type part
to clear up that the pref-type is not fixed in the future.

3. The ordering will be left to Jimi to decide on return but would
remain  as is in the ripe-81++ draft with the same statement on top
whne next sent out. 

4. Jessica will send the diffs to 1 and 2 out to rr-impl
by Tuesday next week at the latest. 

5. Tony will fold these in before the end of that week and send out
the new draft.

        This will be the last changes made other than the possible
ordering change.


                --Tony.
 



-------- Logged at  Fri Sep 9 23:50:20 MET DST 1994  ---------