misleading diagnostic

  > cengiz at ISI.EDU (Cengiz Alaettinoglu) writes:
  > 
  > Below is an update request and reply from the database.
  > It contains three objects:
  > 	*rv: rs900.ra.net 3
  > 	*rv: rs900.ra.net 30
  > 	*rv: rs900.ra.net 300
  > Reply is Update Ok for all three objects.
  > 
  > I checked the database it only contains the last one (the first two
  > are marked with XX). I guess blanks in the key field caused this.


I do not know what the "rv" object is. 
Can you send the config fragment for this?

My guess is that your the rv attribute is parsed only to the first blank.
Assuning that UNIQ is set to rv this means the updates concerned the same
object. In this case the DB software did the right thing in acknowledgin all
updates as successful.

  > What is more interesting entry with "*rv: rs2.ra.net 3" is also
  > deleted as a result of this query.

Query or update?


Daniel



-------- Logged at  Fri Oct 21 13:29:00 MET 1994  ---------