Classless RIPE-81

Tony,

> After a quick look through this certainly looks to be something we can
> come to consensus on reasonably quikcly. If I underastand this
> correctly it gives us a similar amount of database information for
> CLNP as we have today for IP and maps very nicely to boot. Form an
> implementation (RIPE database) point of view these new objects and
> attributes should not be a problem as soon as the DB indexing system
> is truly classless which it isn't today. 

FYI:  Rick and Laurent have our copy of the RIPE DB code working with 
IP aggregate notation (e.g. takes both 192.0.0/24 and 192.0/16 as
independent registrations).  Is that sufficient?

--Dale



-------- Logged at  Tue Mar 29 00:26:12 MET DST 1994  ---------