Thoughts on router object
Laurent Joncheray
Fri Jul 15 20:46:29 CEST 1994
I do not care about the name. As long as it can represent border *and* internal routers. Routers will be looked up by their ip addresses, so the definition of the name is kind of loose. A router can have several DNS names. I 'd like to change the syntax to: SYNTAX: text string > > router: MANDATORY, UNIQUE > > The domain of the router. > > SYNTAX: Full qulified domain name without trailing "." > > EXAMPLE: router: t3-0.enss132.t3.ans.net > > Merit extension > > You can forget about the db_reference stuff. It is useless. As for the 'peer' definition', we (ala and rlr) are working with some NSP in order to include any attributes needed to generate a *full* cisco config file. The definition of the peer is still pending so maybe we can ignore it until we find out more about what information we need. Laurent PS: I didn't write this document :) Just the ?????? -- Laurent Joncheray, E-Mail: lpj at merit.edu Merit Network Inc, 1071 Beal Avenue, Phone: +1 (313) 936 2065 Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Fax: +1 (313) 747 3745 "This is the end, Beautiful friend. This is the end, My only friend, the end" JM -------- Logged at Fri Jul 15 20:52:52 MET DST 1994 ---------
[ rr-impl Archive ]