routing registry
Tony Bates
Tue Feb 15 11:36:39 CET 1994
Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net> writes: * * > dsj at merit.edu writes: * > > As a side note, it would probably be beneficial to set up some sort o * f * > > mail group for this sort of discussion. It might only have a lifetim * e * > > of a few weeks but who knows. * * <rr-impl at ripe.net> has been created. * * I'll give a few quick answers. Tony and Marten will fill in the gaps, * I'm sure. * Trying now ;-). * > > (0) What checks are performed on the RIPE database. * > > For example, * > > (a) Policy conflicts such as AS X is announcing AS A to AS Y, but * AS * > Y isn't * > > listening. As dfk said prcheck does this and is run by the providers. We have some plans to integrate this into the S/W when the PRIDE routines and more generalised. * > > (b) Syntax checking on as-in, as-out and various address fields. * Well actually, there is basic syntax checking which makes sure syntax is correct but has no real knowledge of the semantics (prcheck has this) as yet. As I said above it will be integrated in. * The tool prcheck does this. At this point we leave it to the users * themselves to use the tools. * * > > (1) How are checks performed on the RIPE database. * > > For instance, are there scripts which run out of cron to verify p * olic * > y * > > conflicts, etc. * * We do some regular checks on the database and store the results for * pickup with FTP. Some of this is just syntax and not done too * regularly. * * We daily compare policy information with what we see in well connected * routers and flag the difference. See ftp.ripe.net:ripe/as. The * conflict output is sent to operational mailing lists once a week. * There is also a job which fully syntax checks the database and this is mailed from time to time. The problem is in the old (totally different) S/W we had a looser syntax check and some errors creeped in before the new S/W. * > > (2) What happens as a result of these checks? * > > For instance, if a problem is found with some "as-in" field, is e * mail * > > sent automically to someone? And if so, to whom? * * Not at this point. * Nope - awaits the integration of prcheck type routines into DB update S/W. * > > (3) What happens if I register a net twice? * * The the present entry gets overwritten. * Yes - providing the changed field is newer. * > > (4) Can we really send (on a short-term basis) _all_ our registration * dat * > a? * > > Will we break anything? * * Not to our knowledge. We will store the info with a separate source ID. * This will require some changes to the tools. No big deal though. * It definately shouldn't. It is just a question of indexing a new sourced database and away we go. * > > (5) How does one go about unregistering a net from the RIPE db? Just * vi * > > the file from within my guardian account? * * The network entry can be deleted by sending in an update with a pseudo * attribute "delete:". * * A net can be removed from a group (AS, community) by removing it from * the guardian file. * * > > (6) What is the process for handing out new accounts? How does a new * net * > work * > > service provider get an account on ftp.ripe.net to register his/h * er d * > ata? * * By sending a mail message to us at ncc at ripe.net. * * > > (7) Is the only RIPE db input method by logging in and vi'ing some fi * les? * > > In other words, there doesn't exist an email interface, etc. * * Updates and new entries can be sent by mail to <auto-dbm at ripe.net>. * They will get processed automatically. We process around 15k a month. * Guarded *objects* and requests with user questions can be sent to * <ripe-dbm at ripe.net> and be processed manually (about 60/month). * * > > I remember hearing something about fax and phone in orders. Does * thi * > s * > > really occur and if so, how often? * * Thnakfully only for the Internet registry (address allocation) end of * the business. * * Daniel * * -Tony. -------- Logged at Wed Feb 16 00:08:36 MET 1994 ---------
[ rr-impl Archive ]