as-in/as-out

  > Proxy aggregate for multi-homed AS will be done when people get desperte to
  > reduce the routing table size, so does aggregation beyond AS boundary.  So
  > it is really desirable for routing registry to be designed to anticipate th
  > is
  > will happen and be able to deal with it.  If you allow one route has more t
  > han
  > one orgin, that will do it.  What is the concern of doing that? 

The concern is not with the registry but with the usefulness of the tools.

Daniel

PS: Now we make a proposal that drops one-net one AS and we still get flamed.
:-( ;-)

	No flame,just try to point out the reality :-)
	It is good to know that we agree on this.
	Wrt to tools, there must be a way to make the tool work, right? 
		
						Thanks!
						--jessica 	




-------- Logged at  Thu Apr 28 17:52:36 MET DST 1994  ---------