Separate attributes vs context-aware software [RE: RPS WG (was Re: [Rps] Re: Latest RPSLng draft)]

Hi,

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, David Kessens wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 08:29:23AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> > then let me register my support for the issues and approaches
> > marc raises.  perhaps the system is for the benefit of operations
> > more than the ease of registries?
> 
> I have always agreed with Marc's comments/views on this. However, it
> was also my impression that we were a vocal but small minority.
> 
> I rather see progress towards a pusblished standard, although it
> doesn't do everything exactly the way I want it, than that we reopen all
> the discussions again unless a lot of people changed their minds.

For what it's worth, I, as an operator, have roughly the same opinion.  

I'd like to see a standardized solution soon (I accept the current
draft proposal if that's the rough consensus), but on the other hand,
I'd like it to be as simple as possible to use.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings