Separate attributes vs context-aware software [RE: RPS WG (was Re: [Rps] Re: Latest RPSLng draft)]

> On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 11:29, Randy Bush wrote:
> > then let me register my support for the issues and approaches
> > marc raises.  perhaps the system is for the benefit of operations
> > more than the ease of registries?
> >
> > randy
> >
>
>    There are a number of operators that run their own registries (e.g.
> Level3, Verio, C&W, etc.).   Ping Lu (formerly of C&W) was very vocal
> about preserving the syntax of existing RPSL attributes.
>
>  -Larry

We doesn't have a own registry, but a lot of own tools which deals with RPSL.
>From my point of view I have to change both, my RPSL language parser and the
interpreter. So I could not see a benefit of one solution. Personally, I would
back Marks position but can not really give you a reason.

How about a acclamation at the next RIPE meeting ?

Frank