<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
None at all that I have ever come across. Support depreciation.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
Cheers,<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
Ben<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
<span id="OutlookSignature">
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
Get <a href="https://aka.ms/ghei36">Outlook for Android</a></div>
</span><br>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> routing-wg <routing-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of ripedenis--- via routing-wg <routing-wg@ripe.net><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, May 28, 2019 3:13:03 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> RIPE Routing Working Group<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [routing-wg] Fw: [db-wg] Suggestion further validity-checking</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="ydpe74153a8yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size:16px">
<div></div>
<div>Colleagues</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We have had a suggestion (with some support) on the DB-WG mailing list about deprecating the "holes:" attribute in ROUTE(6) objects. Perhaps the Routing WG could consider if this attribute has any value in the RIPE Database.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>cheers</div>
<div>denis</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>co-chair DB-WG</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div id="ydp971ae400yahoo_quoted_9585803007" class="ydp971ae400yahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size:13px; color:#26282a">
<div>----- Forwarded message -----</div>
<div><b>From:</b> Nick Hilliard via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net></div>
<div><b>To:</b> Edward Shryane <eshryane@ripe.net></div>
<div><b>Cc:</b> "db-wg@ripe.net" <db-wg@ripe.net></div>
<div><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, 28 May 2019, 13:30:30 CEST</div>
<div><b>Subject:</b> Re: [db-wg] Suggestion further validity-checking</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote on 28/05/2019 12:12:
<div class="ydp971ae400yqt0098475553" id="ydp971ae400yqtfd45150"><br clear="none">
> Unfortunately, no cleanup was done when this rule was implemented,<br clear="none">
> but in recent times we try to do this. I will also contact the<br clear="none">
> maintainers of these route objects and ask them to fix the holes<br clear="none">
> attribute(s).</div>
<br clear="none">
I wonder if this key should be formally deprecated. It's used for 643 <br clear="none">
out of 302354 route: objects and 40 out of 28803 route6: objects, i.e. <br clear="none">
~0.2% and 0.1% respectively. The complexity associated with handling it <br clear="none">
is substantial and most tools simply ignore it.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Nick
<div class="ydp971ae400yqt0098475553" id="ydp971ae400yqtfd85611"><br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>