This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] Adding "::" notation to RIPE DB
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Adding "::" notation to RIPE DB
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Adding "::" notation to RIPE DB
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alexander Zubkov
green at qrator.net
Thu Nov 10 08:07:19 CET 2022
Maybe we can add some standard mechanism to identifiy the supported "features" by the IRR server? So client before sending the request can figure out whether the server supports source-tagged as-sets (like bgpq4 now checks if the server supports !a queries). Then the client can add some "flag" in the query that it is willing to receive source-tagged as-sets. On the server side we can strip source prefixes in the reply if the client did not identify its will to receive them. In that case legacy tools should not brake. On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, 06:44 Netmaster (exAS286) <netmaster at as286.net> wrote: > Jared Mauch wrote on Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:39 PM > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:31:06PM +0000, Netmaster (exAS286) wrote: > > > Introducing '::' however might/will break tools following > RFC2280/RFC2622 > > > being read as (and mostly implemented/enforced like this) "a single > colon > > > between set names and AS numbers" (hmmm, it states 'separated by > colons ":"', > > > but examples kind of imply the "single between"). > > > The nice thing is moving to the ASN removes the possibility of > > being unique, I recently moved from AS-NETHER to AS267 to reduce the > > chance of conflict. > > We should also likely move from AS-AKAMAI to AS20940:GLOBAL or > > something else. > > I'm lost. AS20940:GLOBAL wouldn't be a valid AS-SET name. > AS20940:AS-GLOBAL? > > Well, with the requirement of the AS-SET names like ASx:AS-SET requiring > mnt-by of ASx, less likely "by accident" dups showing up. > > But it doesn't protect *evil* person adding ASx to an "open" RR and adding > a bad ASx:AS-SET there. > > <constructive> It's an ugly way, but adding some semantics to the AS-SET > names to point to the right RR, wouldn't break existing tooling and could > be picked up by smarter tools. Like ASx:AS-SET-SOURCE-RIPE only being > valid if source if RIPE. I have said it's ugly, haven't I? And it's not a > proposal to solve the problem (as e.g. if someone would have missed this > semantical layer and would register whyever AS1:AS-FOOBAR-SOURCE-RIPE > in RADB ...) > > Markus > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20221110/0e8c078e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Adding "::" notation to RIPE DB
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Adding "::" notation to RIPE DB
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]