This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] Proposed Service Criticality Form
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Proposed Service Criticality Form
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Proposed Service Criticality Form
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at fastly.com
Fri Dec 23 15:40:42 CET 2022
Dear RIPE NCC, Thanks for offering the opportunity share feedback. I'd like to comment in individual capacity on the porposal Service Criticality ratings. Summary: I consider the proposed criticality ratings appropriate for the RPKI service. Elaboration: 1/ Confidentiality Comment: The purpose of RPKI keys is signing and signature chain verification, a purpose very different from encryption (encryption being a prerequisite for to achieve confidentiality). 2/ Integrity Comment: Unauthorized access to private key materials or to interfaces which trigger operations with private key material (such as the LIR portal) poses a high risk to operators. It is easy to imagine a multitude of scenarios where a compromise of integrity leads to high severity incidents. 3/ Availability Comment: To ability to issue, revoke, and verify RPKI certificates is a 24/7 operational aspect where any downtime stalls business processes. For example, being unable to rectify a misconfigured ROA can have very adverse impact on business. A high severity rating seems proper. I'm happy to elaborate on any of the above comments if the comments raise questions in people! Kind regards, Job On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 04:17:48PM +0100, Nathalie Trenaman wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > During RIPE 84 in May, we discussed the Service Criticality Framework. We mentioned that we would like the Routing Working Group's input on the criticality rating for the RPKI service. > > Thank you to the Co-chairs for asking the working group for input in June with the original form: > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/2022-June/004582.html > > Since we did not receive much feedback so far, we hereby share our proposed completed form with you (see attached PDF). We hope to receive your feedback by 23 December. > > Kind regards > Nathalie Trenaman > RIPE NCC > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Proposed Service Criticality Form
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Proposed Service Criticality Form
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]