This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] Add BGPsec support to Hosted RPKI?
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Add BGPsec support to Hosted RPKI?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Add BGPsec support to Hosted RPKI?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonio Prado
antonio at prado.it
Mon Oct 11 14:46:09 CEST 2021
On 10/11/21 11:33 AM, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: > Wrt BGPSec.. I am actually very happy to see that so many people are in favor of > supporting it. I hope that router vendors are watching. To the best of my knowledge > BGPSec has only been implemented in Bird and Quagga. The main value of supporting > BGPSec in the hosted system would not be to test the protocol as such. This has > already been done using Bird and Quagga and the RPKI tool set by Dragon Research > Labs. hi, I would add another project: ExaBGPsec which uses NIST SRxCrypto library. "This software is based on Exabgp BGP implementation and added codes for implementing BGPSec protocol (RFC 8205)." https://github.com/usnistgov/exabgpsrx -- antonio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 203 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20211011/ecb22fb9/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Add BGPsec support to Hosted RPKI?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Add BGPsec support to Hosted RPKI?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]