This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] [cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] [cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] [cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri May 7 17:42:01 CEST 2021
hi nick, while i too have been ranting for a decade+ about the state of current rpki trust anchors, servers, software, router implemenations, the fantasy that ROV provides attack resistance, etc. etc. etc.; my amateur read of the language > Interoperable secure routing standards are for example Resource-PKI. is not speaking of all those cobbled together pieces, but rather the standard for the rpki as a pki. being a certified curmudgeon, as with the rest of the universe, i am not completely satisfied with the rpki standard. but i am far less unhappy about it than i am about the current implementations, distribution, and vendor code. and props to marco and crew who are trying to educate politicians. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] [cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] [cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]