[routing-wg] RPSL

 Hi Gert
You are right, this has been an issue for many years. It is not only the problem of parsing RPSL but also an issue with people understanding it as a language and applying it correctly. But should this be an issue taken up by the IETF? Or do you think the RIPE Database could/should do something different to all other IRRs?
cheersdenis
co-chair DB-WG

    On Thursday, 14 May 2020, 14:45:11 CEST, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:  
 
 Hi,

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:52:06AM +0000, ripedenis--- via routing-wg wrote:
> Just a comment on the RPSL issue from the RIPE 80 session today. RPSL has little to do with the accuracy of data in the RIPE IRR. RPSL is just a language. Assuming you understand the language, it is your choice whether or not you maintain your data and keep it accurate and up to date.

Right.

That said, the data quality regarding import: and output: lines in the
RIPE DB is so poor that "bad and useless" is not halfway sufficient 
to describe its badness.

I think import/export is beyond repair - it is too complex to correctly
parse, and at the same time not expressive enough to describe policy
precisely enough ("export to AS X as peer, no further upstreaming permitted"
vs. "export to AS Y as upstream, further distribution expected").

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444        USt-IdNr.: DE813185279  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20200514/a88addd3/attachment.html>