[routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, at 19:31, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote:
> I don't think I'm the one that should calculate that. However, if we 
> have an alternative proposal with the SLURM file,  it can be calculated 
> (approximately) as part of the analysis impact that will be needed as 
> well, right?
> 
> May be anyone from the community that already has done that job and 
> integrated the SLURM in their routers, can provide an estimate cost, 
> and then multiply it for the number of all the RIRs members?
> 
> I believe (I may be wrong) that the AS0 is much cheaper to implement by 
> RIPE NCC even if it is several thousand euros, than the number of 
> worldwide folks that will need to use the SLURM in addition to RPKI 
> (for non-AS0).

Let me rephrase: what is the cost to the community of no implementation of 2019-08 at all?

It has been mentioned before that 2019-08 in its current shape seems way too big of a hammer for the problem it claims to solve. I personally consider a SLURM file a good middle-ground, but if it boils down either using the RPKI for this or nothing, the latter option is what I support.

Kind regards,

Job