This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (SLURM file for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (SLURM file for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Weekly Routing Table Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Jul 8 23:14:08 CEST 2020
I would agree on an update to the RIPE710 if we want to make that explicit. However, I don't think that a DoS can be generated, and on the other way around, WG chairs could DoS authors ... The community are the "kings" of the process. Part of the community may want to have a proposal, part of the community not, how the chairs decide?. Not really clear chairs can be wrong, or have some bias. If we do nothing and we allow authors to re-send a proposal, and the community (or 99% of it) is not willing to "participate", they just can stay silent. Consensus can't be declared. Of course, all this is clearly a separate discussion for the "plenary", not the routing WG, as we did in the 710 update ... and work for the new RIPE chair and vice-chair :-) On my part, I'm happy to draft the document if needed. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 8/7/20 20:09, "routing-wg en nombre de Gert Doering" <routing-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de gert at space.net> escribió: Hi, On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 08:04:35PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote: > I may be wrong ... but I can't find any text in RIPE-710, where it sets any filter by the chairs to accept a proposal, neither anyway for the chairs to reject a proposal, there is only a pre-qualification of the most appropriate WG. > > I'd actually this debate already with a previous RIPE chair a few years ago, so I recall it very well. Indeed, it's not written explicitly, but as you well know, it's done that way - the proposer picks a WG to submit to, and the PDO asks the WG chairs if that is OK. An update to write that down sounds like a reasonable plan. (And it very obviously must be that way, otherwise a frustrated proposer can easily DoS a working group - which must be preventable) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (SLURM file for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Weekly Routing Table Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]